• Announcements

    • Benny

      Forums Restructured   09/22/2016

      A lot of less active forums have been removed and consolidated with larger forums.  SEC Recruiting and Official Game Threads have been merged into SEC Football Talk.  All SEC Social Groups have been moved under their respective team forums. All other Social Groups have been merged into the Water Fountain. Other less active off-topic forums such as Think Tank, SciFi, Gaming, etc, have been merged into the Water Fountain.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ECDawg

The IRS Scandal Started at the Top

56 posts in this topic

May 16, 2013, 8:41 p.m. ET

The IRS Scandal Started at the Top

The bureaucrats at the Internal Revenue Service did exactly what the president said was the right and honorable thing to do.

By KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL

Was the White House involved in the IRS's targeting of conservatives? No investigation needed to answer that one. Of course it was.

President Obama and Co. are in full deniability mode, noting that the IRS is an "independent" agency and that they knew nothing about its abuse. The media and Congress are sleuthing for some hint that Mr. Obama picked up the phone and sicced the tax dogs on his enemies.

But that's not how things work in post-Watergate Washington. Mr. Obama didn't need to pick up the phone. All he needed to do was exactly what he did do, in full view, for three years: Publicly suggest that conservative political groups were engaged in nefarious deeds; publicly call out by name political opponents whom he'd like to see harassed; and publicly have his party pressure the IRS to take action.

Mr. Obama now professes shock and outrage that bureaucrats at the IRS did exactly what the president of the United States said was the right and honorable thing to do. "He put a target on our backs, and he's now going to blame the people who are shooting at us?" asks Idaho businessman and longtime Republican donor Frank VanderSloot.

Mr. VanderSloot is the Obama target who in 2011 made a sizable donation to a group supporting Mitt Romney. In April 2012, an Obama campaign website named and slurred eight Romney donors. It tarred Mr. VanderSloot as a "wealthy individual" with a "less-than-reputable record." Other donors were described as having been "on the wrong side of the law."

This was the Obama version of the phone call—put out to every government investigator (and liberal activist) in the land.

Twelve days later, a man working for a political opposition-research firm called an Idaho courthouse for Mr. VanderSloot's divorce records. In June, the IRS informed Mr. VanderSloot and his wife of an audit of two years of their taxes. In July, the Department of Labor informed him of an audit of the guest workers on his Idaho cattle ranch. In September, the IRS informed him of a second audit, of one of his businesses. Mr. VanderSloot, who had never been audited before, was subject to three in the four months after Mr. Obama teed him up for such scrutiny.

The last of these audits was only concluded in recent weeks. Not one resulted in a fine or penalty. But Mr. VanderSloot has been waiting more than 20 months for a sizable refund and estimates his legal bills are $80,000. That figure doesn't account for what the president's vilification has done to his business and reputation.

The Obama call for scrutiny wasn't a mistake; it was the president's strategy—one pursued throughout 2012. The way to limit Romney money was to intimidate donors from giving. Donate, and the president would at best tie you to Big Oil or Wall Street, at worst put your name in bold, and flag you as "less than reputable" to everyone who worked for him: the IRS, the SEC, the Justice Department. The president didn't need a telephone; he had a megaphone.

The same threat was made to conservative groups that might dare play in the election. As early as January 2010, Mr. Obama would, in his state of the union address, cast aspersions on the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling, claiming that it "reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests" (read conservative groups).

The president derided "tea baggers." Vice President Joe Biden compared them to "terrorists." In more than a dozen speeches Mr. Obama raised the specter that these groups represented nefarious interests that were perverting elections. "Nobody knows who's paying for these ads," he warned. "We don't know where this money is coming from," he intoned.

In case the IRS missed his point, he raised the threat of illegality: "All around this country there are groups with harmless-sounding names like Americans for Prosperity, who are running millions of dollars of ads against Democratic candidates . . . And they don't have to say who exactly the Americans for Prosperity are. You don't know if it's a foreign-controlled corporation."

Short of directly asking federal agencies to investigate these groups, this is as close as it gets. Especially as top congressional Democrats were putting in their own versions of phone calls, sending letters to the IRS that accused it of having "failed to address" the "problem" of groups that were "improperly engaged" in campaigns. Because guess who controls that "independent" agency's budget?

The IRS is easy to demonize, but it doesn't exist in a vacuum. It got its heading from a president, and his party, who did in fact send it orders—openly, for the world to see. In his Tuesday press grilling, no question agitated White House Press Secretary Jay Carney more than the one that got to the heart of the matter: Given the president's "animosity" toward Citizens United, might he have "appreciated or wanted the IRS to be looking and scrutinizing those . . ." Mr. Carney cut off the reporter with "That's a preposterous assertion."

Preposterous because, according to Mr. Obama, he is "outraged" and "angry" that the IRS looked into the very groups and individuals that he spent years claiming were shady, undemocratic, even lawbreaking. After all, he expects the IRS to "operate with absolute integrity." Even when he does not.

http://online.wsj.co...ss_opinion_main

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chicagoland thugs gonna thug.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The IRS targeted liberal groups as well.

Number of Tea Party groups denied: 0

Number of Democrat groups denied: 1

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^^That's not what I read...several Conservative groups gave up on getting the 501©3 status...on the other hand, liberal groups got there's in a few short weeks.

Here's what's hilarious about your post...the stinkin' IRS has admitted it unfairly targeted Conservative groups...and you fools are still denying it!!! :)

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JFC you guys will make excuses for anything he does won't you? I can't imagine what you'd say if they found a dead hooker in his bed....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The IRS targeted liberal groups as well.

Number of Tea Party groups denied: 0

Number of Democrat groups denied: 1

Hey fellas, lets think about that for a second. Groups on the right were targeted at a ratio of about 30:1 to those on the left and the only group they found worthy to deny legal status to was a liberal group. An Emerge America really did deserve to be denied because they're overtly political. Their stated mission is to get Democrats elected to office.

Even the IG says they did wrong...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/holder-orders-fbi-justice-probe-of-irs/2013/05/14/7891fde6-bcc0-11e2-9b09-1638acc3942e_story.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The IRS targeted liberal groups as well.

Number of Tea Party groups denied: 0

Number of Democrat groups denied: 1

so?

IRS admits to targeting specific groups of US citizens to further other group's of citizens' political careers.

doesnt take aristotle to put the logical dots together on this one. SOMEONE turned the IRS into a bunch of cronies.

again, if that doesnt scare you, i nominate you for the Sheep-of-the-year award.

Gold-Sheep-Loser-Trophies.jpg

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys wont be happy until you have a video tape of Barry saying to the head IRS guy to lanekiffin.gif over the Tea Party, will you? Because that's what you believe happen, so therefore it did.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys wont be happy until you have a video tape of Barry saying to the head IRS guy to :lanekiffin: over the Tea Party, will you? Because that's what you believe happen, so therefore it did.

Actually...no...every time Barry pushes his belly to a podium he blames all his failures on the GOP, demonizes the Tea Party and anyone else who doesn't agree with him. Basically, Barry, being the "rockstar" president that he is...lays his list out in front of his cabinet henchmen and they do the dirty work...that's how it happened.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually...no...every time Barry pushes his belly to a podium he blames all his failures on the GOP, demonizes the Tea Party and anyone else who doesn't agree with him. Basically, Barry, being the "rockstar" president that he is...lays his list out in front of his cabinet henchmen and they do the dirty work...that's how it happened.

So terrible as a doctor he's now taking his talents to law and being a psychic. Good luck ever proving that fantasy. Enjoy the next 3 and a half years of the Rockstar

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

um obviously all three scandals were Bush' fault. Also, the person in charge is never actually in charge so it's not fair to blame King Obama... unless something good happens, in which case he receives full credit. All Hail!

signed,

Liberals

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see how much crow there is to be eaten when those low level IRS employees finish testifying before Congress. They don't seem to be inclined to go quietly under the bus...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting better and better. Reports are that other angencies involved in political targeting may include FBI, BATFE, and OSHA....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting better and better. Reports are that other angencies involved in political targeting may include FBI, BATFE, and OSHA....

!!!

if true, libs better find a nice soft piece of sand to put their head in

and link please!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

!!!

if true, libs better find a nice soft piece of sand to put their head in

and link please!

There's at least one instance where an individual running two Tea Party leaning groups first went through the follwoing:

1. IRS microscope for the non-profit status. Initial filings were made in 2010 and that process is still ongoing.

2. "Randomly selected" for an audit of their personal finances shortly after 1 started.

3. Concurrently with 2, randomly selected for an audit of their business finances.

4. Conccurently with 2 and 3, FBI started nosing around, asking about particular individuals who had visited their orgs events,

5. After the conclusion 2 and 3 the business, which has a Type 07 FFL, was "randomly selected" for a BATFE audit

6. After 5, OSHA "randomly selects" them for an inspection. The OSHA inspector compliments them on running a type ship with only "minor issues". These "minor issues" result in $25k in fines.

7. After 6, BATFE shows up for another "randomly selected" audit.

8. After all that, the state DEQ shows up for an inspection based on a "confidential complaint." Inspection finds no violations but ends up requiring them to buy another permit @ $2k/year.

Raise your hand if you think all that is just coincidence?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh hey, look at this, smearing whistleblowers by the admin...

http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/2013/s1305.pdf

We also concluded that Burke’s disclosure of the Dodson memorandum to Levine was likely motivated by a desire to undermine Dodson’s public criticisms of Operation Fast and Furious. Although Burke denied to congressional investigators that he had any retaliatory motive for his actions, we found substantial evidence to the contrary…

In sum, we found that Burke violated Department policy when he provided the Dodson memorandum to Fox News reporter Levine without Department approval, and that his explanations for why he did not believe his actions were improper were not credible. We believe this misconduct to be particularly egregious because of Burke’s apparent effort to undermine the credibility of Dodson’s significant public disclosures about the failures in Operation Fast and Furious…

We found Burke’s conduct in disclosing the Dodson memorandum to be inappropriate for a Department employee and wholly unbefitting a U.S. Attorney.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So terrible as a doctor he's now taking his talents to law and being a psychic. Good luck ever proving that fantasy. Enjoy the next 3 and a half years of the Rockstar

Lol...you truly are a liberal sheep. And I'll be fine. Barry will make me pay higher taxes but I've been blessed...it's tools like you that will be hurting.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol...you truly are a liberal sheep. And I'll be fine. Barry will make me pay higher taxes but I've been blessed...it's tools like you that will be hurting.

I'm doing just fine. I'm especially enjoying your side having to been over and take another term. Your whining is music to my ears.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm doing just fine. I'm especially enjoying your side having to been over and take another term. Your whining is music to my ears.

You're bending over too...scary thing is...you're enjoying it.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're bending over too...scary thing is...you're enjoying it.

dont waste your breath. yeah, hes bending over just like the rest of us, but he either doesnt realize it or hes just too lanekiffin.gifing indifferent to bother. its par for the course. liberals are either ignorant or indifferent.

libs just want to be on the winning team. its so eaaaaasy to be a liberal, why do you think everyone is doing it?

what i enjoy most about the modern 2013 american liberal is that they are the party of no beliefs. they have no philosophy. they have no political beliefs grounded in reason. they have no rudder other than statist group-think. theyre self-admitting OBAMA STOOGES and theyre ok with that. it hasnt occurred to them that being a stooge is never a good idea.

liberal ideology sells a product that sounds too good to be true. guess what? it aint.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liberals see politics as a sporting event and not something with real repercussions. The sad part is they think we do too.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont waste your breath. yeah, hes bending over just like the rest of us, but he either doesnt realize it or hes just too :lanekiffin:ing indifferent to bother. its par for the course. liberals are either ignorant or indifferent.

libs just want to be on the winning team. its so eaaaaasy to be a liberal, why do you think everyone is doing it?

what i enjoy most about the modern 2013 american liberal is that they are the party of no beliefs. they have no philosophy. they have no political beliefs grounded in reason. they have no rudder other than statist group-think. theyre self-admitting OBAMA STOOGES and theyre ok with that. it hasnt occurred to them that being a stooge is never a good idea.

liberal ideology sells a product that sounds too good to be true. guess what? it aint.

Well put...a study done in the NYT or LAT...not sure, concluded that "strong" men are typically conservative and "weak" men are typically liberal...makes sense.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IRS Official Lois Lerner Will Plead The 5th Amendment

http://livewire.talk...d-5th-amendment

what a :lanekiffin:ing piece of s--t.

let me repeat.

Lois Lerner is a :lanekiffin:ing. Piece. Of. s--t.

...shes a piece of s--t.

Just read this, but, have to admit...I'm not surprised. This administration will go down in history as one of...if not the "dirtiest" in American History...but you can bet your ass when this fiasco is finally over, those lanekiffin.gifing idiots in the lame-stream media will have a circle jerk using their tears for lubricant...they'll have parades...statues...hell, they'll probably replace Lincoln's head with his for the "Obama Monument". Dumbasses have finally taken over the majority in this country.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Posts

    • TheRealBrave
      I can safely say it is impossible for a QB to have a sluggish start vs. Georgia right now
    • L.A.Hog
      No one with a family and common sense want trump to destroy this country....
    • TheRealBrave
      Something that bothered me was Lester Holt being Hillary's personal fact checker and attempting to correct Trump consistently. He didn't jump on her for lying when she denied saying TPP is the gold standard of trade deals. It is plain as day that she said it, and relatively recently.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpLQzeCoNnA&app=desktop
    • Mizzou_Fan
      So now we'll move on to LSU and Tennessee. 
    • Flea
      LSU is the only Power 5 team in a state with a tiny population compared to Texas.  LSU and Bama made out like bandits by bringing in A&M.  And to show how autonomous LSU is, wasn't their recent change decided at ULL game?   Houston?  A serious multi-year threat?  With their pack 45,000 seat stadium and limited funds?   They flash every few decades. They won't keep TH that long.   tu?  Can't compete with the SEC brand.  TCU and Baylor?  Self-destruct at least once per 20 years.   
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      foxflyer5
      foxflyer5
      55
    2. 2
      bbqit
      bbqit
      52
    3. 3
      JoeGator
      JoeGator
      51
    4. 4
      razorhead
      razorhead
      51
    5. 5
      PuddingTime
      PuddingTime
      48